A Comprehensive Guide on MERN Stack vs MEAN Stack

Web development is a process that combines various technologies to build efficient and dynamic websites. A website has three major elements: the database, the server side, and the client side. These elements are combined to form a ‘stack’, responsible for establishing the overall scalability of a web application. In the IT sector, two of the most popular stacks are MERN and MEAN due to their ability to build reliable and robust web applications. However, it is essential to compare the differences between MERN and MEAN stacks to understand which technology suits your application and website development. This blog will explore the differences between both stacks, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages.

What is MERN Stack?

The MERN stack is a powerful combination of technologies used to build scalable, high-performance websites and mobile applications. It is popular for its versatility and efficiency, MERN stands out due to its reliance on JavaScript as the primary programming language, enabling developers to work seamlessly across both the server and client sides of an application. This unified language approach simplifies development and ensures smooth operation across the stack.

The MERN stack has four technologies:

• MongoDB: A flexible, non-relational (NoSQL) database that stores data in a JSON-like format. It’s ideal for applications that require frequent data updates and real-time processing.
• Express.js: A lightweight and efficient backend web application framework for Node.js. It simplifies server-side development, allowing developers to build robust APIs, handle HTTP, and enhance application performance.
• React: A popular front-end JavaScript library developed by Facebook. React enables developers to create dynamic, interactive, and user-friendly interfaces with reusable components, making it a favorite for modern web applications.
• Node.js: A runtime environment that executes JavaScript on the server side. Node.js is known for its speed and scalability, making it perfect for handling real-time, data-intensive applications.

What is MEAN Stack?

The MEAN stack is another JavaScript-based technology stack widely used for developing cloud-ready web applications and websites. Like MERN, MEAN uses JavaScript across all its layers, ensuring a streamlined process of development. However, MEAN stands apart with its use of Angular for front-end development, making it a strong choice for building extensible, flexible, and scalable applications that are well-suited for cloud hosting.

The MEAN stack consists of four key technologies:

• MongoDB: This is a NoSQL database that keeps data in a flexible, JSON-like format. Its object-oriented structure makes it highly compatible with cloud-based applications.
• Express.js: A flexible backend framework for Node.js that simplifies the creation of web applications and APIs. It strikes a balance between providing essential features and maintaining a lightweight, developer-friendly experience.
• Angular: A front-end framework developed by Google. Angular is a comprehensive solution for building dynamic, single-page applications (SPAs) with a rich user interface.
• Node.js: A server-side runtime environment that executes JavaScript code. Node.js is renowned for its ability to handle high scalability and performance demands, making it a perfect fit for cloud-based applications.

Advantages and Disadvantages of MERN Stack

Like all stack development technologies, the MERN stack has advantages and disadvantages. Before deciding if the MERN stack suits your needs, consider the essential factors that make up this stack. The MERN stack offers advantages like streamlining web development with full JavaScript compatibility and strong community support. However, it comes with challenges, such as a steeper learning curve and potential complexities in managing large-scale applications. Here are the advantages and disadvantages of the MERN stack:

Advantages of MERN Stack

The MERN stack (MongoDB, Express.js, React, Node.js) offers many advantages for modern web development. With its unified JavaScript ecosystem, it can improve productivity through reusable components. Its scalability and strong open-source community support make it a popular choice for full-stack applications. Here are some advantages of using the MERN stack:

• JavaScript as the Primary Language: The MERN stack uses a singular language (JavaScript) throughout its web development process. It uses JavaScript for both front-end and back-end development, which promotes code consistency.  
• Cost-Effectiveness and Open Source: The MERN stack is entirely open source, eliminating licensing costs for developers. This makes it an affordable option for startups and small businesses while speeding up development timelines.
• Easy to Use: React’s component-based system and intuitive syntax make the stack easy to work with. It allows developers to build scalable and useable web applications.
• Scalability and Enhanced Performance: Each component of the MERN stack is designed to optimize the performance of web applications. Node.js (for server-side operations) and MongoDB (for database management) ensure high scalability and performance. 
• Quick Full Stack Development: The MERN stack facilitates quick experimentation and iteration due to its flexibility and rapid prototyping. Additionally, React’s reusable components improve code reusability, reducing development effort and time.

Disadvantages of MERN Stack

The MERN is a powerful stack with high scalability, however, it has several drawbacks. It includes compatibility problems with complex, large-scale web applications, a steep learning curve, and scalability issues.  Here are some disadvantages of the MERN stack:

• Scalability Issues: The MERN stack is commonly used to build single-page applications (SPAs). However, Node.js may struggle with handling CPU-intensive tasks or high server loads, as it is single-threaded by default.
• Complex Learning Curve for Beginners: For a beginner, the MERN stack can be an overwhelming and time-consuming learning challenge. It requires proficiency in multiple technologies, such as MongoDB, Express, React, Node.js, and JavaScript. Mastering these frameworks and their integrations can be time-consuming.
• Security Concerns: While JavaScript offers great flexibility, it is also prone to security threats like cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL injection. Developers should follow best practices and implement robust security measures to protect applications from potential risks.
• Achieving Real-Time Updates: Implementing real-time updates in MERN applications often requires additional technologies and libraries, such as WebSockets or Firebase. The stack is not inherently optimized for real-time functionalities, making it less suitable for applications requiring instant data synchronization.

Advantages and Disadvantages of MEAN Stack

The MEAN stack has its specialized technology, designed to cater to the different needs of developers and specific applications. In the section below, we have listed some advantages and disadvantages of working with the MEAN stack.

Advantages of MEAN Stack

The MEAN stack (MongoDB, Express.js, Angular, Node.js) offers full-stack JavaScript development, enabling code consistency and faster deployment. Here are some advantages of using the MEAN stack:

• Single Language Programming: MEAN stack uses JavaScript for client-side and server-side development, ensuring a uniform codebase. This simplifies development, enhances efficiency, and reduces the need for context-switching between languages.
• Built-in Web Server: Node.js comes with an integrated web server, allowing applications to scale effortlessly to handle traffic surges. This built-in capability makes deployment and management easier for developers.
• Full-Stack Capabilities: MEAN offers a complete technology stack for front-end, back-end, and database management. This streamlines the development process, reducing dependencies on external tools.
• Seamless Data Handling with JSON: MongoDB’s JSON-like data structure ensures smooth data organization and seamless communication between front-end and back-end components. Thus, eliminating data format inconsistencies.
• Angular for Engaging User Interface: Angular’s component-based structure and two-way data binding enable the creation of highly interactive, responsive, and user-friendly web applications.

Disadvantages of MEAN Stack

The MEAN stack (MongoDB, Express.js, Angular, Node.js) has several disadvantages, including MongoDB’s vulnerable data security and Angular’s steep learning curve. Here are some disadvantages of the MEAN stack:

• Vulnerable Data Security: The MEAN stack has a vulnerable framework in terms of data security. Its component, MongoDB, has been scrutinized due to its security concerns. 
• Time-Consuming Development: Since the MEAN stack comprises several technologies, it can be complex to integrate and requires highly specialized developers. This can increase development time and costs.
• Complex Angular: Angular is a full-fledged framework with a steep learning curve, making it less suitable for small-scale projects or lightweight applications.
• Maturity of Technologies: The MEAN stack and its components are widely used. However, often not mature enough than other available stacks.

Difference Between MERN and MEAN Stack: Which Is Better?

A key difference between the MEAN and the MERN stack is their front-end technologies. MEAN uses Angular as the front-end framework, while MERN uses React, a JavaScript library focused solely on the view layer. However, when it comes to which is better, MERN or MEAN, you should first understand the requirements of your web development projects and determine the goals. The stack you choose to work with should be on par with the capabilities of your developer and client needs. In the table below, we have listed some factors you should consider before selecting the right stack:

Features and Parameters	MERN Stack	MEAN Stack
Developer Skills Acquisition	Easier: The presence of an elaborate React library allows developers to build applications faster.	Steeper: MEAN’s Angular framework takes time to get used to, but once mastered, it streamlines the assembly of interactive and intricate user interfaces.
Flexibility and Scalability	More Flexible: MERN’s Node.js framework offers great flexibility to application development.	More Scalable: Though both MERN and MEAN have great scalability. MEAN is comparatively better for complex and bigger apps.
Real-Time Data Processing	Versatile: The stack is versatile in terms of database options.	High Performance: Due to its scalability, it performs well when handling large amounts of data.
Community Support	Growing: MERN’s React has a resourceful, growing, and vibrant community with constant support.	Established: MEAN has a large and established community. Developers have easy access to blogs, forums, and training courses.
Popularity	Backed by Meta, MERN is popular for creating smaller apps, rapid development, and dynamic UI.	Backed by Google, MEAN is popular for creating web applications at an enterprise level.
Example of Applications	Facebook/Meta, Airbnb, and Netflix	Accenture, Intel, and LinkedIn

Conclusion

MERN vs MEAN stacks have unique features, advantages, and limitations. The MERN stack is often preferred for its flexibility and React’s component-based architecture, making it ideal for dynamic and interactive applications. On the other hand, the MEAN stack is favored for Angular’s robust framework and structured approach, which is excellent for large-scale, enterprise-level projects. The choice between MERN and MEAN ultimately depends on your project requirements and your development team’s expertise. If your team is experienced with Angular, the MEAN stack can help you build applications quickly. However, if your team includes fresher developers or prefers a more flexible approach, the MERN stack might be better. If you’re ready to master Angular and improve your MEAN stack skills, explore the Angular roadmap to begin your learning journey.

FAQs